Method and system for managing routing across multiple networks with separate routing masters

ABSTRACT

Novel tools and techniques are provided for implementing management of routing across multiple voice or data networks with separate routing masters. In various embodiments, in response to receiving a request to establish a call between a calling party in a first network and a called party in a second network, a computing system might receive a first set of network information from a first routing database(s) that is operated by a first service provider and a second set of network information from a second routing database(s) that is operated by a second service provider separate from the first service provider; might analyze the received first and second sets of network information to generate a unified routing model for optimizing routing of the call through the first and second networks; and might establish the call through a selected optimized route based on the generated unified routing model.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains materialthat is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has noobjection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent documentor the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and TrademarkOffice patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrightrights whatsoever.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates, in general, to methods, systems, andapparatuses for implementing call or data routing, and, moreparticularly, to methods, systems, and apparatuses for implementingmanagement of routing across multiple voice or data networks withseparate routing masters.

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, voice networks (or data networks) associated with oroperated by different service providers might utilize different networkrouting protocols and/or routing models. As a result, for voice calls(or for data transmission) across such different networks associatedwith or operated by different service providers, inefficient callconnections (or inefficient data transfer) may result.

Hence, there is a need for more robust and scalable solutions forimplementing call or data routing, and, more particularly, to methods,systems, and apparatuses for implementing management of routing acrossmultiple voice or data networks with separate routing masters.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A further understanding of the nature and advantages of particularembodiments may be realized by reference to the remaining portions ofthe specification and the drawings, in which like reference numerals areused to refer to similar components. In some instances, a sub-label isassociated with a reference numeral to denote one of multiple similarcomponents. When reference is made to a reference numeral withoutspecification to an existing sub-label, it is intended to refer to allsuch multiple similar components.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a system for implementingmanagement of routing of a call across multiple voice networks withseparate routing masters, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating another system forimplementing management of routing of data across multiple data networkswith separate routing masters, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating yet another system forimplementing management of routing of a call or data across multiplenetworks with separate routing masters, in accordance with variousembodiments.

FIGS. 4A-4C are flow diagrams illustrating a method for implementingmanagement of routing of a call across multiple networks with separaterouting masters, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary computer or systemhardware architecture, in accordance with various embodiments.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating a networked system of computers,computing systems, or system hardware architecture, which can be used inaccordance with various embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN EMBODIMENTS

Overview

Various embodiments provide tools and techniques for implementing callor data routing, and, more particularly, to methods, systems, andapparatuses for implementing management of routing across multiple voiceor data networks with separate routing masters.

In various embodiments, a computing system might receive, from a firstuser at an originating point (via a first user device(s), or the like)in at least one first network, either a request to establish a callbetween a calling party (e.g., the first user) and a called party (e.g.,a second user) at a destination point (via a second user device(s), orthe like) in at least one second network or a request to establish aconnection between the first user and the second user at the destinationpoint (via the second user device(s), or the like) in the at least onesecond network to facilitate transmission and reception of data betweenthe first user device(s) and the second user device(s). The computingsystem might receive a first set of network information from one or morefirst routing databases associated with the at least one first networkthat is operated by a first service provider; might receive a second setof network information from one or more second routing databasesassociated with the at least one second network that is operated by asecond service provider that is separate from the first serviceprovider; (optionally) might receive one or more of a third set ofnetwork information from one or more third routing databases associatedwith at least one third network 220 c operated by a third serviceprovider that is separate from each of the first service provider andthe second service provider through an N^(th) set of network informationfrom one or more N^(th) routing databases associated with at least oneN^(th) network 220 n operated by an N^(th) service provider that isseparate from each of the first service provider, the second serviceprovider, and the third service provider.

The computing system might analyze the received network information(e.g., the received first set of network information, the receivedsecond set of network information, and (optionally or where applicable)one or more of the received third through N^(th) set of networkinformation, or the like) either to generate a unified routing model foroptimizing routing of the call between the calling party and the calledparty through the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork (and, optionally or where applicable, one or more of the atleast one third network through the at least one N^(th) network) or togenerate a unified routing model for optimizing routing of the databetween the first user device and the second user device through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, one or more of the at least one thirdnetwork through the at least one N^(th) network). The computing systemmight select an optimized route between the first user device and thesecond user device through the at least one first network and the atleast one second network (and, optionally or where applicable, one ormore of the at least one third network through the at least one N^(th)network) for establishing the call based at least in part on thegenerated unified routing model or for establishing the connection,and/or facilitating routing of data, between the first user device andthe second user device, based at least in part on the generated unifiedrouting model; and might establish the call based at least in part onthe selected optimized route or establish the connection, and/orfacilitating routing of data, between the first user device and thesecond user device through the at least one first network and the atleast one second network (and, optionally or where applicable, one ormore of the at least one third network through the at least one N^(th)network), based at least in part on the selected optimized route.

Merely by way of example, in some instances, the first through N^(th)sets of network information might each include, but is not limited to,at least one of private peering agreements, private commercial exchangedata, traffic exchange agreements, cost data for traffic exchange,service level agreements, minimum contractually required traffic,maximum contractually required traffic, local exchange routing guide(“LERG”) data, number portability, user identification portability, keyperformance indicator (“KPI”) data, data regarding health of networkroutes, capacity of network routes, quality of service (“QoS”), industrydata, service level agreements (“SLA”), connectivity details, usagedata, call detail records, call statistics, data transmission logs,network connectivity statistics, network configuration data, or otherattributes from each network, and/or the like.

In some embodiments, the computing system might apply weighting factorsto predetermined categories of data among each of the first set ofnetwork information and the second set of network information (and,optionally or where applicable, one or more of the at least one thirdthrough N^(th) sets of network information, or the like). In such cases,generating the unified routing model for optimizing routing of the databetween the first user device and the second user device through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) might comprisegenerating the unified routing model for optimizing routing of the databetween the first user device and the second user device through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) based at least inpart on the applied weighting factors to the predetermined categories ofdata among each of the first set of network information and the secondset of network information (and, optionally or where applicable, the oneor more of the at least one third through N^(th) sets of networkinformation, or the like). In some instances, the weighting factorsmight be based on at least one of KPI data, data regarding health ofnetwork routes, capacity of network routes, QoS, industry data, SLA, orprivate commercial exchange data, and/or the like.

According to some embodiments, the computing system might normalizerouting data to fit each subnetwork within each of the at least onefirst network and the at least one second network (and, optionally orwhere applicable, the one or more of the at least one third networkthrough the at least one N^(th) network), and might datafill eachrouting engine in each corresponding subnetwork within each of the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) with thenormalized routing data. In such cases, establishing the call orestablishing the connection, and/or facilitating routing of data,between the first user device and the second user device through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, one or more of the at least one thirdnetwork through the at least one N^(th) network) based on the selectedoptimized route might comprise sending, with the computing system,routing instructions to each routing engine to route the call or toroute the data based on the normalized routing data.

In some embodiments, selecting the optimized route through the at leastone first network and the at least one second network (and, optionallyor where applicable, the one or more of the at least one third networkthrough the at least one N^(th) network) might comprise identifying,with the computing system, one or more direct routes through each of theat least one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) between theoriginating point and the destination point; identifying, with thecomputing system, one or more indirect routes through each of the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) between theoriginating point and the destination point; identifying, with thecomputing system, one or more customers connected to each of the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network); analyzing, withthe computing system, at least one of the identified one or more directroutes, the identified one or more indirect routes, or the identifiedone or more customers; and selecting, with the computing system, anoptimized route through the at least one first network and the at leastone second network (and, optionally or where applicable, the one or moreof the at least one third network through the at least one N^(th)network) for establishing the call or for establishing the connection,and/or facilitating routing of data, between the first user device andthe second user device based at least in part on the generated unifiedrouting model and based at least in part on the analysis of the at leastone of the identified one or more direct routes, the identified one ormore indirect routes, or the identified one or more customers.

These and other aspects of the management of routing of voice or dataacross multiple voice or data networks with separate routing masters aredescribed in greater detail with respect to the figures.

The following detailed description illustrates a few exemplaryembodiments in further detail to enable one of skill in the art topractice such embodiments. The described examples are provided forillustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of theinvention.

In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerousspecific details are set forth in order to provide a thoroughunderstanding of the described embodiments. It will be apparent to oneskilled in the art, however, that other embodiments of the presentinvention may be practiced without some of these specific details. Inother instances, certain structures and devices are shown in blockdiagram form. Several embodiments are described herein, and whilevarious features are ascribed to different embodiments, it should beappreciated that the features described with respect to one embodimentmay be incorporated with other embodiments as well. By the same token,however, no single feature or features of any described embodimentshould be considered essential to every embodiment of the invention, asother embodiments of the invention may omit such features.

Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers used herein to expressquantities, dimensions, and so forth used should be understood as beingmodified in all instances by the term “about.” In this application, theuse of the singular includes the plural unless specifically statedotherwise, and use of the terms “and” and “or” means “and/or” unlessotherwise indicated. Moreover, the use of the term “including,” as wellas other forms, such as “includes” and “included,” should be considerednon-exclusive. Also, terms such as “element” or “component” encompassboth elements and components comprising one unit and elements andcomponents that comprise more than one unit, unless specifically statedotherwise.

Various embodiments described herein, while embodying (in some cases)software products, computer-performed methods, and/or computer systems,represent tangible, concrete improvements to existing technologicalareas, including, without limitation, call routing technology, callrouting management technology, data routing technology, data routingmanagement technology, network management technology, and/or the like.In other aspects, certain embodiments, can improve the functioning ofuser equipment or systems themselves (e.g., call routing systems, callrouting management systems, data routing systems, data routingmanagement systems, network management systems, etc.), for example, byreceiving, with a computing system from a calling party at anoriginating point in at least one first network, a request to establisha call between the calling party and a called party at a destinationpoint in at least one second network; receiving, with the computingsystem, a first set of network information from one or more firstrouting databases associated with the at least one first network that isoperated by a first service provider; receiving, with the computingsystem, a second set of network information from one or more secondrouting databases associated with the at least one second network thatis operated by a second service provider that is separate from the firstservice provider; analyzing, with the computing system, the receivedfirst set of network information and the received second set of networkinformation to generate a unified routing model for optimizing routingof the call between the calling party and the called party through theat least one first network and the at least one second network;selecting, with the computing system, an optimized route through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network forestablishing the call based at least in part on the generated unifiedrouting model; and establishing, with the computing system, the callbased at least in part on the selected optimized route; and/or the like.

In particular, to the extent any abstract concepts are present in thevarious embodiments, those concepts can be implemented as describedherein by devices, software, systems, and methods that involve specificnovel functionality (e.g., steps or operations), such as, analyzing,with the computing system, the received first set of network informationand the received second set of network information to generate a unifiedrouting model for optimizing routing of the call between the callingparty and the called party through the at least one first network andthe at least one second network; selecting, with the computing system,an optimized route through the at least one first network and the atleast one second network for establishing the call based at least inpart on the generated unified routing model; and establishing, with thecomputing system, the call based at least in part on the selectedoptimized route; and/or the like, which optimizes networks associatedwith different service providers to facilitate call routing acrossdifferent networks, and/or the like, to name a few examples, that extendbeyond mere conventional computer processing operations. In a similarmanner, data routing may be improved and facilitated. Thesefunctionalities can produce tangible results outside of the implementingcomputer system, including, merely by way of example, optimized routingof calls or data across different networks associated with or operatedby different service providers, and/or the like, at least some of whichmay be observed or measured by customers and/or service providers.

In an aspect, a method might comprise receiving, with a computing systemfrom a calling party at an originating point in at least one firstnetwork, a request to establish a call between the calling party and acalled party at a destination point in at least one second network;receiving, with the computing system, a first set of network informationfrom one or more first routing databases associated with the at leastone first network that is operated by a first service provider; andreceiving, with the computing system, a second set of networkinformation from one or more second routing databases associated withthe at least one second network that is operated by a second serviceprovider that is separate from the first service provider. The methodmight further comprise analyzing, with the computing system, thereceived first set of network information and the received second set ofnetwork information to generate a unified routing model for optimizingrouting of the call between the calling party and the called partythrough the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork; selecting, with the computing system, an optimized routethrough the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork for establishing the call based at least in part on thegenerated unified routing model; and establishing, with the computingsystem, the call based at least in part on the selected optimized route.

In some embodiments, the computing system might comprise at least one ofa call server, a call controller, a call manager, a media gatewaycontroller, centralized call server, a centralized call controller, acentralized call manager, or a centralized media gateway controller,and/or the like. In some cases, the calling device associated with thecalling party might comprise at least one of a telephone, a voice overInternet protocol (“VoIP”) private branch exchange (“PBX”), atime-division multiplexing (“TDM”) voice PBX, a VoIP soft client, afacsimile machine, or a voice origination device, and/or the like. Insome instances, the at least one first network and the at least onesecond network might each comprise at least one of a circuit-switchednetwork, a public switched telephone network, a voice over Internetprotocol (“VoIP”) network, a computer network, or the Internet, and/orthe like.

According to some embodiments, the first set of network information andthe second set of network information might each comprise at least oneof private peering agreements, private commercial exchange data, trafficexchange agreements, cost data for traffic exchange, service levelagreements, minimum contractually required traffic, maximumcontractually required traffic, local exchange routing guide (“LERG”)data, number portability, key performance indicator (“KPI”) data, dataregarding health of network routes, capacity of network routes, qualityof service (“QoS”), industry data, service level agreements (“SLA”),connectivity details, usage data, call detail records, call statistics,network connectivity statistics, network configuration data, or otherattributes from each network, and/or the like.

In some embodiments, the method might further comprise applying, withthe computing system, weighting factors to predetermined categories ofdata among each of the first set of network information and the secondset of network information. In such cases, generating the unifiedrouting model for optimizing routing of the call between the callingparty and the called party through the at least one first network andthe at least one second network might comprise generating the unifiedrouting model for optimizing routing of the call between the callingparty and the called party through the at least one first network andthe at least one second network based at least in part on the appliedweighting factors to the predetermined categories of data among each ofthe first set of network information and the second set of networkinformation. In some instances, the weighting factors might be based onat least one of key performance indicator (“KPI”) data, data regardinghealth of network routes, capacity of network routes, quality of service(“QoS”), industry data, service level agreements (“SLA”), or privatecommercial exchange data, and/or the like.

Merely by way of example, in some cases, selecting the optimized routethrough the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork for establishing the call based on the generated unified routingmodel might comprise identifying, with the computing system, one or moredirect routes through each of the at least one first network and the atleast one second network between the originating point and thedestination point; identifying, with the computing system, one or moreindirect routes through each of the at least one first network and theat least one second network between the originating point and thedestination point; identifying, with the computing system, one or morecustomers connected to each of the at least one first network and the atleast one second network; analyzing, with the computing system, at leastone of the identified one or more direct routes, the identified one ormore indirect routes, or the identified one or more customers; andselecting, with the computing system, an optimized route through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network forestablishing the call based at least in part on the generated unifiedrouting model and based at least in part on the analysis of the at leastone of the identified one or more direct routes, the identified one ormore indirect routes, or the identified one or more customers.

According to some embodiments, the method might further comprisenormalizing, with the computing system, routing data to fit eachsubnetwork within each of the at least one first network and the atleast one second network; and datafilling, with the computing system,each routing engine in each corresponding subnetwork within each of theat least one first network and the at least one second network with thenormalized routing data. In such cases, establishing the call based onthe selected optimized route might comprise sending, with the computingsystem, routing instructions to each routing engine in eachcorresponding subnetwork within each of the at least one first networkand the at least one second network to route the call based on thenormalized routing data.

In some embodiments, the method might further comprise receiving, withthe computing system, a third set of network information from one ormore third routing databases associated with at least one third networkoperated by a third service provider that is separate from each of thefirst service provider and the second service provider. In such cases,analyzing the received first set of network information and the receivedsecond set of network information to generate the unified routing modelfor optimizing routing of the call between the calling party and thecalled party might comprise analyzing, with the computing system, thereceived first set of network information, the received second set ofnetwork information, and the received third set of network informationto generate a unified routing model for optimizing routing of the callbetween the calling party and the called party through the at least onefirst network, the at least one second network, and the at least onethird network. Selecting the optimized route through the at least onefirst network and the at least one second network for establishing thecall based at least in part on the generated unified routing model mightcomprise selecting, with the computing system, an optimized routethrough the at least one first network, the at least one second network,and the at least one third network for establishing the call based atleast in part on the generated unified routing model. Establishing thecall based at least in part on the selected optimized route mightcomprise establishing, with the computing system, the call through theat least one first network, the at least one second network, and the atleast one third network based at least in part on the selected optimizedroute.

In another aspect, an apparatus might comprise at least one processorand a non-transitory computer readable medium communicatively coupled tothe at least one processor. The non-transitory computer readable mediummight have stored thereon computer software comprising a set ofinstructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, causesthe apparatus to: receive, from a calling party at an originating pointin at least one first network, a request to establish a call between thecalling party and a called party at a destination point in at least onesecond network; receive a first set of network information from one ormore first routing databases associated with the at least one firstnetwork that is operated by a first service provider; receive a secondset of network information from one or more second routing databasesassociated with the at least one second network that is operated by asecond service provider that is separate from the first serviceprovider; analyze the received first set of network information and thereceived second set of network information to generate a unified routingmodel for optimizing routing of the call between the calling party andthe called party through the at least one first network and the at leastone second network; select an optimized route through the at least onefirst network and the at least one second network for establishing thecall based at least in part on the generated unified routing model; andestablish the call based at least in part on the selected optimizedroute.

In some embodiments, the apparatus might comprise at least one of a callserver, a call controller, a call manager, a media gateway controller,centralized call server, a centralized call controller, a centralizedcall manager, or a centralized media gateway controller, and/or thelike. In some cases, the at least one first network and the at least onesecond network might each comprise at least one of a circuit-switchednetwork, a public switched telephone network, a voice over Internetprotocol (“VoIP”) network, a computer network, or the Internet, and/orthe like. In some instances, the first set of network information andthe second set of network information might each comprise at least oneof private peering agreements, private commercial exchange data, trafficexchange agreements, cost data for traffic exchange, service levelagreements, minimum contractually required traffic, maximumcontractually required traffic, local exchange routing guide (“LERG”)data, number portability, key performance indicator (“KPI”) data, dataregarding health of network routes, capacity of network routes, qualityof service (“QoS”), industry data, service level agreements (“SLA”),connectivity details, usage data, call detail records, call statistics,network connectivity statistics, network configuration data, or otherattributes from each network, and/or the like.

According to some embodiments, the set of instructions, when executed bythe at least one processor, might further cause the apparatus to: applyweighting factors to predetermined categories of data among each of thefirst set of network information and the second set of networkinformation. In such cases, generating the unified routing model foroptimizing routing of the call between the calling party and the calledparty through the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork might comprise generating the unified routing model foroptimizing routing of the call between the calling party and the calledparty through the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork based at least in part on the applied weighting factors to thepredetermined categories of data among each of the first set of networkinformation and the second set of network information. In someinstances, the weighting factors might be based on at least one of keyperformance indicator (“KPI”) data, data regarding health of networkroutes, capacity of network routes, quality of service (“QoS”), industrydata, service level agreements (“SLA”), or private commercial exchangedata, and/or the like.

In some embodiments, selecting the optimized route through the at leastone first network and the at least one second network for establishingthe call based on the generated unified routing model might compriseidentifying one or more direct routes through each of the at least onefirst network and the at least one second network between theoriginating point and the destination point; identifying one or moreindirect routes through each of the at least one first network and theat least one second network between the originating point and thedestination point; identifying one or more customers connected to eachof the at least one first network and the at least one second network;analyzing at least one of the identified one or more direct routes, theidentified one or more indirect routes, or the identified one or morecustomers; and selecting an optimized route through the at least onefirst network and the at least one second network for establishing thecall based at least in part on the generated unified routing model andbased at least in part on the analysis of the at least one of theidentified one or more direct routes, the identified one or moreindirect routes, or the identified one or more customers.

According to some embodiments, the set of instructions, when executed bythe at least one processor, might further cause the apparatus to:normalize routing data to fit each subnetwork within each of the atleast one first network and the at least one second network; anddatafill each routing engine in each corresponding subnetwork withineach of the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork with the normalized routing data. In such cases, establishingthe call based on the selected optimized route might comprise sendingrouting instructions to each routing engine in each correspondingsubnetwork within each of the at least one first network and the atleast one second network to route the call based on the normalizedrouting data.

In some embodiments, the set of instructions, when executed by the atleast one processor, might further cause the apparatus to: receive athird set of network information from one or more third routingdatabases associated with at least one third network operated by a thirdservice provider that is separate from each of the first serviceprovider and the second service provider. In such cases, analyzing thereceived first set of network information and the received second set ofnetwork information to generate the unified routing model for optimizingrouting of the call between the calling party and the called party mightcomprise analyzing the received first set of network information, thereceived second set of network information, and the received third setof network information to generate a unified routing model foroptimizing routing of the call between the calling party and the calledparty through the at least one first network, the at least one secondnetwork, and the at least one third network. Selecting the optimizedroute through the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork for establishing the call based at least in part on thegenerated unified routing model might comprise selecting an optimizedroute through the at least one first network, the at least one secondnetwork, and the at least one third network for establishing the callbased at least in part on the generated unified routing model.Establishing the call based at least in part on the selected optimizedroute might comprise establishing the call through the at least onefirst network, the at least one second network, and the at least onethird network based at least in part on the selected optimized route.

In yet another aspect, a system might comprise a computing system, whichmight comprise at least one first processor and a first non-transitorycomputer readable medium communicatively coupled to the at least onefirst processor. The first non-transitory computer readable medium mighthave stored thereon computer software comprising a first set ofinstructions that, when executed by the at least one first processor,causes the computing system to: receive, from a calling party at anoriginating point in at least one first network, a request to establisha call between the calling party and a called party at a destinationpoint in at least one second network; receive a first set of networkinformation from one or more first routing databases associated with theat least one first network that is operated by a first service provider;receive a second set of network information from one or more secondrouting databases associated with the at least one second network thatis operated by a second service provider that is separate from the firstservice provider; analyze the received first set of network informationand the received second set of network information to generate a unifiedrouting model for optimizing routing of the call between the callingparty and the called party through the at least one first network andthe at least one second network; select an optimized route through theat least one first network and the at least one second network forestablishing the call based at least in part on the generated unifiedrouting model; and establish the call based at least in part on theselected optimized route.

Various modifications and additions can be made to the embodimentsdiscussed without departing from the scope of the invention. Forexample, while the embodiments described above refer to particularfeatures, the scope of this invention also includes embodiments havingdifferent combination of features and embodiments that do not includeall of the above described features.

Specific Exemplary Embodiments

We now turn to the embodiments as illustrated by the drawings. FIGS. 1-6illustrate some of the features of the method, system, and apparatus forimplementing call or data routing, and, more particularly, to methods,systems, and apparatuses for implementing management of routing of voiceor data across multiple voice or data networks with separate routingmasters, as referred to above. The methods, systems, and apparatusesillustrated by FIGS. 1-6 refer to examples of different embodiments thatinclude various components and steps, which can be consideredalternatives or which can be used in conjunction with one another in thevarious embodiments. The description of the illustrated methods,systems, and apparatuses shown in FIGS. 1-6 is provided for purposes ofillustration and should not be considered to limit the scope of thedifferent embodiments.

With reference to the figures, FIG. 1 is a schematic diagramillustrating a system 100 for implementing management of routing of acall across multiple voice networks with separate routing masters, inaccordance with various embodiments.

In the non-limiting embodiment of FIG. 1, system 100 might comprise acomputing system(s) 105, a calling device 110 (which might include,without limitation, a telephone 110 a, a smart phone 110 b, a mobilephone 110 c, or the like), a called device 115 (which might include, butis not limited to, a telephone 115 a, a smart phone 115 b, a mobilephone 115 c, or the like), and a plurality of sets of networks 120(which might include, without limitation, at least one first network 120a associated with and/or operated by a first service provider, at leastone second network 120 b associated with and/or operated by a secondservice provider that is separate or different from the first serviceprovider, at least one third network 120 c associated with and/oroperated by a third service provider that is separate or different fromeach of the first service provider and the second service provider,through at least one N^(th) network 120 n associated with and/oroperated by a N^(th) service provider that is separate or different fromeach of the first service provider, the second service provider, and thethird service provider, and/or the like.). Each of the plurality of setsof networks 120 might comprise at least one routing engine 125 and atleast one routing database 130. For example, as shown in FIG. 1, the atleast one first network 120 a might comprise at least one first routingengine 125 a and at least one first routing database 130 a, while the atleast one second network 120 b might comprise at least one secondrouting engine 125 b and at least one second routing database 130 b, andthe at least one third network 120 c might comprise at least one thirdrouting engine 125 c and at least one third routing database 130 c, andso on, through the at least one N^(th) network 120 n comprising at leastone N^(th) routing engine 125 n and at least one N^(th) routing database130 n, etc.

In some embodiments, the computing system(s) might include, withoutlimitation, at least one of a call server, a call controller, a callmanager, a media gateway controller, centralized call server, acentralized call controller, a centralized call manager, or acentralized media gateway controller, and/or the like. In some cases,the calling device 110 associated with a calling party and the calleddevice 115 associated with a called party might each include, but is notlimited to, at least one of a telephone, a voice over Internet protocol(“VoIP”) private branch exchange (“PBX”), a time-division multiplexing(“TDM”) voice PBX, a VoIP soft client, a facsimile machine, or a voiceorigination device, and/or the like.

According to some embodiments, the at least one first network 120 a, theat least one second network 120 b, the at least one third network 120 c,through the at least one N^(th) network 120 n might each include,without limitation, at least one of a circuit-switched network, a publicswitched telephone network (“PSTN”), a VoIP network, a computer network,or the Internet. In some cases, the at least one first network 120 a,the at least one second network 120 b, the at least one third network120 c, through the at least one N^(th) network 120 n might eachalternatively include a local area network (“LAN”), including, withoutlimitation, a fiber network, an Ethernet network, a Token-Ring™ network,and/or the like; a wide-area network (“WAN”); a wireless wide areanetwork (“WWAN”); a virtual network, such as a virtual private network(“VPN”); an intranet; an extranet; an infra-red network; a wirelessnetwork, including, without limitation, a network operating under any ofthe IEEE 802.11 suite of protocols, the Bluetooth™ protocol known in theart, and/or any other wireless protocol; and/or any combination of theseand/or other networks. In a particular embodiment, the network(s) 120might include an access network and/or a core network of thecorresponding service provider (e.g., an Internet service provider(“ISP”)).

In operation, the computing system(s) 105 might receive, from thecalling party at an originating point (via a first user device(s), e.g.,calling device 110, or the like) in at least one first network (e.g.,first network(s) 120 a, or the like), a request to establish a callbetween the calling party and the called party at a destination point(via a second user device(s), e.g., called device 115, or the like) inat least one second network (e.g., second network(s) 120 b, or thelike). The computing system(s) 105 might receive a first set of networkinformation from one or more first routing databases (e.g., routingdatabase(s) 130 a, or the like) associated with the at least one firstnetwork 120 a that is operated by the first service provider; mightreceive a second set of network information from one or more secondrouting databases (e.g., routing database(s) 130 b, or the like)associated with the at least one second network 120 b that is operatedby the second service provider that is separate from the first serviceprovider; (optionally) might receive a third set of network informationfrom one or more third routing databases (e.g., routing database(s) 130c, or the like) associated with at least one third network 120 coperated by a third service provider that is separate from each of thefirst service provider and the second service provider; and so on untilreceiving an N^(th) set of network information, where the computingsystem(s) might receive an N^(th) set of network information from one ormore N^(th) routing databases (e.g., routing database(s) 130 n, or thelike) associated with at least one N^(th) network 120 n operated by anN^(th) service provider that is separate from each of the first serviceprovider, the second service provider, and the third service provider.The computing system(s) 105 might analyze the received networkinformation (e.g., the received first set of network information, thereceived second set of network information, and (optionally or whereapplicable) one or more of the received third through N^(th) set ofnetwork information, or the like) to generate a unified routing modelfor optimizing routing of the call between the calling party and thecalled party through the at least one first network and the at least onesecond network (and, optionally or where applicable, one or more of theat least one third network through the at least one N^(th) network). Thecomputing system(s) 105 might select an optimized route through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, one or more of the at least one thirdnetwork through the at least one N^(th) network) for establishing thecall based at least in part on the generated unified routing model; andmight establish the call based at least in part on the selectedoptimized route.

Merely by way of example, in some instances, the first through N^(th)sets of network information might each include, but is not limited to,at least one of private peering agreements, private commercial exchangedata, traffic exchange agreements, cost data for traffic exchange,service level agreements, minimum contractually required traffic,maximum contractually required traffic, local exchange routing guide(“LERG”) data, number portability, key performance indicator (“KPI”)data, data regarding health of network routes, capacity of networkroutes, quality of service (“QoS”), industry data, service levelagreements (“SLA”), connectivity details, usage data, call detailrecords, call statistics, network connectivity statistics, networkconfiguration data, or other attributes from each network, and/or thelike.

In some embodiments, the computing system(s) 105 might apply weightingfactors to predetermined categories of data among each of the first setof network information and the second set of network information (and,optionally or where applicable, one or more of the at least one thirdthrough N^(th) sets of network information, or the like). In such cases,generating the unified routing model for optimizing routing of the callbetween the calling party and the called party through the at least onefirst network and the at least one second network (and, optionally orwhere applicable, the one or more of the at least one third networkthrough the at least one N^(th) network) might comprise generating theunified routing model for optimizing routing of the call between thecalling party and the called party through the at least one firstnetwork and the at least one second network (and, optionally or whereapplicable, the one or more of the at least one third network throughthe at least one N^(th) network) based at least in part on the appliedweighting factors to the predetermined categories of data among each ofthe first set of network information and the second set of networkinformation (and, optionally or where applicable, the one or more of theat least one third through N^(th) sets of network information, or thelike). In some instances, the weighting factors might be based on atleast one of KPI data, data regarding health of network routes, capacityof network routes, QoS, industry data, SLA, or private commercialexchange data, and/or the like.

According to some embodiments, the computing system(s) 105 mightnormalize routing data to fit each subnetwork within each of the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network), and mightdatafill each routing engine in each corresponding subnetwork withineach of the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork (and, optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the atleast one third network through the at least one N^(th) network) withthe normalized routing data. In such cases, establishing the call basedon the selected optimized route might comprise sending, with thecomputing system(s) 105, routing instructions to each routing engine(e.g., routing engine 125 a and routing engine 125 b (and, optionally orwhere applicable, corresponding one or more of routing engines 125 c-125n, or the like) in each corresponding subnetwork within each of the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) to route the callbased on the normalized routing data.

In some embodiments, selecting the optimized route through the at leastone first network and the at least one second network (and, optionallyor where applicable, the one or more of the at least one third networkthrough the at least one N^(th) network) for establishing the call basedon the generated unified routing model comprise identifying, with thecomputing system(s) 105, one or more direct routes through each of theat least one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) between theoriginating point and the destination point; identifying, with thecomputing system(s) 105, one or more indirect routes through each of theat least one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) between theoriginating point and the destination point; identifying, with thecomputing system(s) 105, one or more customers connected to each of theat least one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network); analyzing, withthe computing system(s) 105, at least one of the identified one or moredirect routes, the identified one or more indirect routes, or theidentified one or more customers; and selecting, with the computingsystem(s) 105, an optimized route through the at least one first networkand the at least one second network (and, optionally or whereapplicable, the one or more of the at least one third network throughthe at least one N^(th) network) for establishing the call based atleast in part on the generated unified routing model and based at leastin part on the analysis of the at least one of the identified one ormore direct routes, the identified one or more indirect routes, or theidentified one or more customers.

These and other functions of the system 100 (and its components) aredescribed in greater detail below with respect to FIGS. 2-4.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating another system 200 forimplementing management of routing of data across multiple data networkswith separate routing masters, in accordance with various embodiments.

In the non-limiting embodiment of FIG. 2, system 200 might comprise acomputing system(s) 205, a first user device 210 (which might include,without limitation, a tablet computer 210 a, a smart phone 210 b, amobile phone 210 c, a laptop computer 210 d, or the like), a second userdevice 215 (which might include, but is not limited to, a tabletcomputer 215 a, a smart phone 215 b, a mobile phone 215 c, a laptopcomputer 215 d, or the like), and a plurality of sets of networks 220(which might include, without limitation, at least one first network 220a associated with and/or operated by a first service provider, at leastone second network 220 b associated with and/or operated by a secondservice provider that is separate or different from the first serviceprovider, at least one third network 220 c associated with and/oroperated by a third service provider that is separate or different fromeach of the first service provider and the second service provider,through at least one N^(th) network 220 n associated with and/oroperated by a N^(th) service provider that is separate or different fromeach of the first service provider, the second service provider, and thethird service provider, and/or the like.). Each of the plurality of setsof networks 220 might comprise at least one routing engine 225 and atleast one routing database 230. For example, as shown in FIG. 2, the atleast one first network 220 a might comprise at least one first routingengine 225 a and at least one first routing database 230 a, while the atleast one second network 220 b might comprise at least one secondrouting engine 225 b and at least one second routing database 230 b, andthe at least one third network 220 c might comprise at least one thirdrouting engine 225 c and at least one third routing database 230 c, andso on, through the at least one N^(th) network 220 n comprising at leastone N^(th) routing engine 225 n and at least one N^(th) routing database230 n, etc.

According to some embodiments, the at least one first network 220 a, theat least one second network 220 b, the at least one third network 220 c,through the at least one N^(th) network 220 n might each include a localarea network (“LAN”), including, without limitation, a fiber network, anEthernet network, a Token-Ring™ network, and/or the like; a wide-areanetwork (“WAN”); a wireless wide area network (“WWAN”); a virtualnetwork, such as a virtual private network (“VPN”); the Internet; anintranet; an extranet; a public switched telephone network (“PSTN”); aninfra-red network; a wireless network, including, without limitation, anetwork operating under any of the IEEE 802.11 suite of protocols, theBluetooth™ protocol known in the art, and/or any other wirelessprotocol; and/or any combination of these and/or other networks. In aparticular embodiment, the network might include an access network ofthe service provider (e.g., an Internet service provider (“ISP”)). Inanother embodiment, the network might include a core network of theservice provider, and/or the Internet.

In operation, the computing system(s) 205 might receive, from a firstuser at an originating point (via a first user device(s), e.g., firstuser device(s) 210, or the like) in at least one first network (e.g.,first network(s) 220 a, or the like), a request to establish aconnection between the first user and a second user at a destinationpoint (via a second user device(s), e.g., second user device(s) 215, orthe like) in at least one second network (e.g., second network(s) 220 b,or the like) to facilitate transmission and reception of data betweenthe first user device(s) 210 and the second user device(s) 215. Thecomputing system(s) 205 might receive a first set of network informationfrom one or more first routing databases (e.g., routing database(s) 230a, or the like) associated with the at least one first network 220 athat is operated by the first service provider; might receive a secondset of network information from one or more second routing databases(e.g., routing database(s) 230 b, or the like) associated with the atleast one second network 220 b that is operated by the second serviceprovider that is separate from the first service provider; (optionally)might receive a third set of network information from one or more thirdrouting databases (e.g., routing database(s) 230 c, or the like)associated with at least one third network 220 c operated by a thirdservice provider that is separate from each of the first serviceprovider and the second service provider; and so on until receiving anN^(th) set of network information, where the computing system(s) mightreceive an N^(th) set of network information from one or more N^(th)routing databases (e.g., routing database(s) 230 n, or the like)associated with at least one N^(th) network 220 n operated by an N^(th)service provider that is separate from each of the first serviceprovider, the second service provider, and the third service provider.The computing system(s) 205 might analyze the received networkinformation (e.g., the received first set of network information, thereceived second set of network information, and (optionally or whereapplicable) one or more of the received third through N^(th) set ofnetwork information, or the like) to generate a unified routing modelfor optimizing routing of the data between the first user device and thesecond user device through the at least one first network and the atleast one second network (and, optionally or where applicable, one ormore of the at least one third network through the at least one N^(th)network). The computing system(s) 205 might select an optimized routebetween the first user device and the second user device through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, one or more of the at least one thirdnetwork through the at least one N^(th) network) for establishing theconnection, and/or facilitating routing of data, between the first userdevice and the second user device, based at least in part on thegenerated unified routing model; and might establish the connection,and/or facilitating routing of data, between the first user device andthe second user device through the at least one first network and the atleast one second network (and, optionally or where applicable, one ormore of the at least one third network through the at least one N^(th)network), based at least in part on the selected optimized route.

Merely by way of example, in some instances, the first through N^(th)sets of network information might each include, but is not limited to,at least one of private peering agreements, private commercial exchangedata, traffic exchange agreements, cost data for traffic exchange,service level agreements, minimum contractually required traffic,maximum contractually required traffic, local exchange routing guide(“LERG”) data, number portability, user identification portability, keyperformance indicator (“KPI”) data, data regarding health of networkroutes, capacity of network routes, quality of service (“QoS”), industrydata, service level agreements (“SLA”), connectivity details, usagedata, call detail records, call statistics, data transmission logs,network connectivity statistics, network configuration data, or otherattributes from each network, and/or the like.

In some embodiments, the computing system(s) 205 might apply weightingfactors to predetermined categories of data among each of the first setof network information and the second set of network information (and,optionally or where applicable, one or more of the at least one thirdthrough N^(th) sets of network information, or the like). In such cases,generating the unified routing model for optimizing routing of the databetween the first user device and the second user device through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) might comprisegenerating the unified routing model for optimizing routing of the databetween the first user device and the second user device through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) based at least inpart on the applied weighting factors to the predetermined categories ofdata among each of the first set of network information and the secondset of network information (and, optionally or where applicable, the oneor more of the at least one third through N^(th) sets of networkinformation, or the like). In some instances, the weighting factorsmight be based on at least one of KPI data, data regarding health ofnetwork routes, capacity of network routes, QoS, industry data, SLA, orprivate commercial exchange data, and/or the like.

According to some embodiments, the computing system(s) 205 mightnormalize routing data to fit each subnetwork within each of the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network), and mightdatafill each routing engine in each corresponding subnetwork withineach of the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork (and, optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the atleast one third network through the at least one N^(th) network) withthe normalized routing data. In such cases, establishing the connection,and/or facilitating routing of data, between the first user device andthe second user device through the at least one first network and the atleast one second network (and, optionally or where applicable, one ormore of the at least one third network through the at least one N^(th)network) based on the selected optimized route might comprise sending,with the computing system(s) 205, routing instructions to each routingengine (e.g., routing engine 225 a and routing engine 225 b (and,optionally or where applicable, corresponding one or more of routingengines 225 c-225 n, or the like) in each corresponding subnetworkwithin each of the at least one first network and the at least onesecond network (and, optionally or where applicable, the one or more ofthe at least one third network through the at least one N^(th) network)to route the data based on the normalized routing data.

In some embodiments, selecting the optimized route through the at leastone first network and the at least one second network (and, optionallyor where applicable, the one or more of the at least one third networkthrough the at least one N^(th) network) for establishing theconnection, and/or facilitating routing of data, between the first userdevice and the second user device based on the generated unified routingmodel comprise identifying, with the computing system(s) 205, one ormore direct routes through each of the at least one first network andthe at least one second network (and, optionally or where applicable,the one or more of the at least one third network through the at leastone N^(th) network) between the originating point and the destinationpoint; identifying, with the computing system(s) 205, one or moreindirect routes through each of the at least one first network and theat least one second network (and, optionally or where applicable, theone or more of the at least one third network through the at least oneN^(th) network) between the originating point and the destination point;identifying, with the computing system(s) 205, one or more customersconnected to each of the at least one first network and the at least onesecond network (and, optionally or where applicable, the one or more ofthe at least one third network through the at least one N^(th) network);analyzing, with the computing system(s) 205, at least one of theidentified one or more direct routes, the identified one or moreindirect routes, or the identified one or more customers; and selecting,with the computing system(s) 205, an optimized route through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (and,optionally or where applicable, the one or more of the at least onethird network through the at least one N^(th) network) for establishingthe connection, and/or facilitating routing of data, between the firstuser device and the second user device based at least in part on thegenerated unified routing model and based at least in part on theanalysis of the at least one of the identified one or more directroutes, the identified one or more indirect routes, or the identifiedone or more customers.

The computing system(s) 205, the first user device 210, the second userdevice 215, the plurality of sets of networks 220 a-220 n, the firstthrough N^(th) routing engines 225 a-225 n, and the first through N^(th)routing databases 230 a-230 n of system 200 of FIG. 2 are otherwisesimilar, if not identical, to the computing system(s) 105, the callingdevice 110, the called device 115, the plurality of sets of networks 120a-120 n, the first through N^(th) routing engines 125 a-125 n, and thefirst through N^(th) routing databases 130 a-130 n, respectively, ofsystem 100 of FIG. 1, and the descriptions of these components of system200 are applicable to the corresponding components of system 100,respectively.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating yet another system 300 forimplementing management of routing of a call or data across multiplenetworks with separate routing masters, in accordance with variousembodiments.

In the non-limiting embodiment of FIG. 3, system 300 might comprise acomputing system(s) 305, a first user device(s) 310, a second userdevice(s) 315, at least one first network 320 a associated with and/oroperated by a first service provider, at least one second network 320 bassociated with and/or operated by a second service provider that isseparate or different from the first service provider, at least onefirst routing engine 325 a and corresponding at least one first routingdatabase 330 a associated with the at least one first network 320 a, atleast one second routing engine 325 b and corresponding at least onesecond routing database 330 b associated with the at least one secondnetwork 320 b, a plurality of first nodes or switches 335 a-335 j in theat least one first network 320 a, and a plurality of second nodes orswitches 340 a-340 j in the at least one second network 320 b, and/orthe like. Although two sets of networks 320 a and 320 b (each associatedwith and/or operated by different service providers) are shown in FIG.3, the various embodiments are not so limited, and any suitable numberof sets of networks 320 may be used. Although FIG. 3 depicts ten firstnodes or switches 335 a-335 j in the at least one first network 320 a,and although FIG. 3 depicts ten second nodes or switches 340 a-340 j inthe at least one second network 320 b, the various embodiments are notso limited, and any suitable number first and second nodes or switches335 and 340 may be used as appropriate or as desired.

As a result of the operations as described herein with respect to FIGS.1, 2, and 4, whether for implementing management of routing of a callacross multiple voice networks with separate routing masters (as inFIGS. 1 and 4, or the like) or for management of routing of data acrossmultiple data networks with separate routing masters implementing (as inFIG. 2, or the like), the first user device in the first network isconnected with the second user device in a second network via a selectedoptimized route through the first network(s) and through the secondnetwork(s). Such an optimized route may be as shown in FIG. 3, whichexample includes a route (depicted by arrow 345) between the first userdevice(s) 310 in first network(s) 320 a and the second user device(s)315 in second network(s) 320 b via first nodes or switches 335 a, 335 d,335 h, 335 i, 335 f, 335 c, and 335 g and via second nodes or switches340 a, 340 e, 340 h, 340 i, 340 f, 340 g, and 340 c.

These and other features and functions are described in greater detailwith respect to FIGS. 1, 2, and 4.

The computing system(s) 305, the first user device 310, the second userdevice 315, the plurality of sets of networks 320 a and 320 b, the firstand second routing engines 325 a and 325 b, and the first and secondrouting databases 330 a and 330 b of system 300 of FIG. 3 are otherwisesimilar, if not identical, to the computing system(s) 105, the callingdevice 110, the called device 115, the plurality of sets of networks 120a-120 n, the first through N^(th) routing engines 125 a-125 n, and thefirst through N^(th) routing databases 130 a-130 n, respectively, ofsystem 100 of FIG. 1, and the descriptions of these components of system300 are applicable to the corresponding components of system 100,respectively. Similarly, the computing system(s) 305, the first userdevice 310, the second user device 315, the plurality of sets ofnetworks 320 a and 320 b, the first and second routing engines 325 a and325 b, and the first and second routing databases 330 a and 330 b ofsystem 300 of FIG. 3 are otherwise similar, if not identical, to thecomputing system(s) 205, the first user device 210, the second userdevice 215, the plurality of sets of networks 220 a-220 n, the firstthrough N^(th) routing engines 225 a-225 n, and the first through N^(th)routing databases 230 a-230 n, respectively, of system 200 of FIG. 2,and the descriptions of these components of system 300 are applicable tothe corresponding components of system 200, respectively.

FIGS. 4A-4C (collectively, “FIG. 4”) are flow diagrams illustrating amethod 400 for implementing management of routing of a call acrossmultiple networks with separate routing masters, in accordance withvarious embodiments. Method 400 of FIG. 4A continues onto FIG. 4Bfollowing the circular marker denoted, “A.”

While the techniques and procedures are depicted and/or described in acertain order for purposes of illustration, it should be appreciatedthat certain procedures may be reordered and/or omitted within the scopeof various embodiments. Moreover, while the method 400 illustrated byFIG. 4 can be implemented by or with (and, in some cases, are describedbelow with respect to) the systems, examples, or embodiments 100, 200,and 300 of FIGS. 1, 2, and 3, respectively (or components thereof), suchmethods may also be implemented using any suitable hardware (orsoftware) implementation. Similarly, while each of the systems,examples, or embodiments 100, 200, and 300 of FIGS. 1, 2, and 3,respectively (or components thereof), can operate according to themethod 400 illustrated by FIG. 4 (e.g., by executing instructionsembodied on a computer readable medium), the systems, examples, orembodiments 100, 200, and 300 of FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 can each also operateaccording to other modes of operation and/or perform other suitableprocedures.

In the non-limiting embodiment of FIG. 4A, method 400, at block 405,might comprise receiving, with a computing system from a calling partyat an originating point in at least one first network, a request toestablish a call between the calling party and a called party at adestination point in at least one second network. In some embodiments,the computing system might include, without limitation, at least one ofa call server, a call controller, a call manager, a media gatewaycontroller, centralized call server, a centralized call controller, acentralized call manager, or a centralized media gateway controller,and/or the like. In some cases, the calling device associated with thecalling party might include, but is not limited to, at least one of atelephone, a voice over Internet protocol (“VoIP”) private branchexchange (“PBX”), a time-division multiplexing (“TDM”) voice PBX, a VoIPsoft client, a facsimile machine, or a voice origination device, and/orthe like. Similarly, the called device associated with the called partymight include, without limitation, at least one of a telephone, a VoIPPBX, a TDM voice PBX, a VoIP soft client, a facsimile machine, or avoice origination device, and/or the like.

Method 400 might further comprise receiving, with the computing system,a first set of network information from one or more first routingdatabases associated with the at least one first network that isoperated by a first service provider (block 410); receiving, with thecomputing system, a second set of network information from one or moresecond routing databases associated with the at least one second networkthat is operated by a second service provider that is separate from thefirst service provider (block 415); and receiving, with the computingsystem, a third set of network information from one or more thirdrouting databases associated with at least one third network operated bya third service provider that is separate from each of the first serviceprovider and the second service provider (optional block 420).

In some instances, the first set of network information and the secondset of network information (and optionally the third set of networkinformation) might each include, without limitation, at least one ofprivate peering agreements, private commercial exchange data, trafficexchange agreements, cost data for traffic exchange, service levelagreements, minimum contractually required traffic, maximumcontractually required traffic, local exchange routing guide (“LERG”)data, number portability, key performance indicator (“KPI”) data, dataregarding health of network routes, capacity of network routes, qualityof service (“QoS”), industry data, service level agreements (“SLA”),connectivity details, usage data, call detail records, call statistics,network connectivity statistics, network configuration data, or otherattributes from each network, and/or the like. According to someembodiments, method 400 might further comprise, at optional block 425,applying, with the computing system, weighting factors to predeterminedcategories of data among each of the first set of network informationand the second set of network information. In some cases, the weightingfactors might be based on at least one of KPI data, data regardinghealth of network routes, capacity of network routes, QoS, industrydata, SLA, or private commercial exchange data, and/or the like.

At block 430, method 400 might comprise analyzing, with the computingsystem, the received first set of network information and the receivedsecond set of network information to generate a unified routing modelfor optimizing routing of the call between the calling party and thecalled party through the at least one first network and the at least onesecond network. Alternatively, method 400, at optional block 430′, mightcomprise generating the unified routing model for optimizing routing ofthe call between the calling party and the called party through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network based atleast in part on the applied weighting factors to the predeterminedcategories of data among each of the first set of network informationand the second set of network information (and optionally the third setof network information). Method 400 might continue onto the process atoptional block 430″ in FIG. 4B following the circular marker denoted,“A.”

At optional block 430″ in FIG. 4B (following the circular markerdenoted, “A”), method 400 might comprise analyzing, with the computingsystem, the received first set of network information, the receivedsecond set of network information, and the received third set of networkinformation to generate a unified routing model for optimizing routingof the call between the calling party and the called party through theat least one first network, the at least one second network, and the atleast one third network. At block 435, method 400 might compriseselecting, with the computing system, an optimized route through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network forestablishing the call based at least in part on the generated unifiedrouting model. Alternatively, method 400 might comprise, at optionalblock 435″, selecting, with the computing system, an optimized routethrough the at least one first network, the at least one second network,and the at least one third network for establishing the call based atleast in part on the generated unified routing model.

Method 400 might further comprise normalizing, with the computingsystem, routing data to fit each subnetwork within each of the at leastone first network and the at least one second network (optional block440); datafilling, with the computing system, each routing engine ineach corresponding subnetwork within each of the at least one firstnetwork and the at least one second network with the normalized routingdata (optional block 445); and sending, with the computing system,routing instructions to each routing engine in each correspondingsubnetwork within each of the at least one first network and the atleast one second network to route the call based on the normalizedrouting data (optional block 450).

At block 455, method 400 might comprise establishing, with the computingsystem, the call based at least in part on the selected optimized route.Alternatively, or additionally, method 400 might comprise establishing,with the computing system, the call through the at least one firstnetwork, the at least one second network, and the at least one thirdnetwork based at least in part on the selected optimized route (optionalblock 455″).

With reference to FIG. 4C, selecting the optimized route through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network forestablishing the call based on the generated unified routing model (atblock 435) might comprise identifying, with the computing system, one ormore direct routes through each of the at least one first network andthe at least one second network between the originating point and thedestination point (block 460); identifying, with the computing system,one or more indirect routes through each of the at least one firstnetwork and the at least one second network between the originatingpoint and the destination point (block 465); identifying, with thecomputing system, one or more customers connected to each of the atleast one first network and the at least one second network (block 470);analyzing, with the computing system, at least one of the identified oneor more direct routes, the identified one or more indirect routes, orthe identified one or more customers (block 475); and selecting, withthe computing system, an optimized route through the at least one firstnetwork and the at least one second network for establishing the callbased at least in part on the generated unified routing model and basedat least in part on the analysis of the at least one of the identifiedone or more direct routes, the identified one or more indirect routes,or the identified one or more customers (block 480).

Although method 400 of FIG. 4 is directed to improved or optimizedrouting of calls across multiple data networks with separate routingmasters, the various embodiments are not so limited, and the method 400may likewise be directed to improved or optimized routing of data acrossmultiple data networks with separate routing masters, in accordance withthe embodiments described herein.

Exemplary System and Hardware Implementation

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary computer or systemhardware architecture, in accordance with various embodiments. FIG. 5provides a schematic illustration of one embodiment of a computer system500 of the service provider system hardware that can perform the methodsprovided by various other embodiments, as described herein, and/or canperform the functions of computer or hardware system (i.e., computingsystems 105, 205, and 305, calling device 110, called device 115,routing engines 125 a-125 n, 225 a-225 n, and 325 a-325 n, first userdevices 210 and 310, second user devices 215 and 315, and nodes/switches335 a-335 j and 340 a-340 j, etc.), as described above. It should benoted that FIG. 5 is meant only to provide a generalized illustration ofvarious components, of which one or more (or none) of each may beutilized as appropriate. FIG. 5, therefore, broadly illustrates howindividual system elements may be implemented in a relatively separatedor relatively more integrated manner.

The computer or hardware system 500—which might represent an embodimentof the computer or hardware system (i.e., computing systems 105, 205,and 305, calling device 110, called device 115, routing engines 125a-125 n, 225 a-225 n, and 325 a-325 n, first user devices 210 and 310,second user devices 215 and 315, and nodes/switches 335 a-335 j and 340a-340 j, etc.), described above with respect to FIGS. 1-4—is showncomprising hardware elements that can be electrically coupled via a bus505 (or may otherwise be in communication, as appropriate). The hardwareelements may include one or more processors 510, including, withoutlimitation, one or more general-purpose processors and/or one or morespecial-purpose processors (such as microprocessors, digital signalprocessing chips, graphics acceleration processors, and/or the like);one or more input devices 515, which can include, without limitation, amouse, a keyboard, and/or the like; and one or more output devices 520,which can include, without limitation, a display device, a printer,and/or the like.

The computer or hardware system 500 may further include (and/or be incommunication with) one or more storage devices 525, which can comprise,without limitation, local and/or network accessible storage, and/or caninclude, without limitation, a disk drive, a drive array, an opticalstorage device, solid-state storage device such as a random accessmemory (“RAM”) and/or a read-only memory (“ROM”), which can beprogrammable, flash-updateable, and/or the like. Such storage devicesmay be configured to implement any appropriate data stores, including,without limitation, various file systems, database structures, and/orthe like.

The computer or hardware system 500 might also include a communicationssubsystem 530, which can include, without limitation, a modem, a networkcard (wireless or wired), an infra-red communication device, a wirelesscommunication device and/or chipset (such as a Bluetooth™ device, an802.11 device, a WiFi device, a WiMax device, a WWAN device, cellularcommunication facilities, etc.), and/or the like. The communicationssubsystem 530 may permit data to be exchanged with a network (such asthe network described below, to name one example), with other computeror hardware systems, and/or with any other devices described herein. Inmany embodiments, the computer or hardware system 500 will furthercomprise a working memory 535, which can include a RAM or ROM device, asdescribed above.

The computer or hardware system 500 also may comprise software elements,shown as being currently located within the working memory 535,including an operating system 540, device drivers, executable libraries,and/or other code, such as one or more application programs 545, whichmay comprise computer programs provided by various embodiments(including, without limitation, hypervisors, VMs, and the like), and/ormay be designed to implement methods, and/or configure systems, providedby other embodiments, as described herein. Merely by way of example, oneor more procedures described with respect to the method(s) discussedabove might be implemented as code and/or instructions executable by acomputer (and/or a processor within a computer); in an aspect, then,such code and/or instructions can be used to configure and/or adapt ageneral purpose computer (or other device) to perform one or moreoperations in accordance with the described methods.

A set of these instructions and/or code might be encoded and/or storedon a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as thestorage device(s) 525 described above. In some cases, the storage mediummight be incorporated within a computer system, such as the system 500.In other embodiments, the storage medium might be separate from acomputer system (i.e., a removable medium, such as a compact disc,etc.), and/or provided in an installation package, such that the storagemedium can be used to program, configure, and/or adapt a general purposecomputer with the instructions/code stored thereon. These instructionsmight take the form of executable code, which is executable by thecomputer or hardware system 500 and/or might take the form of sourceand/or installable code, which, upon compilation and/or installation onthe computer or hardware system 500 (e.g., using any of a variety ofgenerally available compilers, installation programs,compression/decompression utilities, etc.) then takes the form ofexecutable code.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that substantialvariations may be made in accordance with specific requirements. Forexample, customized hardware (such as programmable logic controllers,field-programmable gate arrays, application-specific integratedcircuits, and/or the like) might also be used, and/or particularelements might be implemented in hardware, software (including portablesoftware, such as applets, etc.), or both. Further, connection to othercomputing devices such as network input/output devices may be employed.

As mentioned above, in one aspect, some embodiments may employ acomputer or hardware system (such as the computer or hardware system500) to perform methods in accordance with various embodiments of theinvention. According to a set of embodiments, some or all of theprocedures of such methods are performed by the computer or hardwaresystem 500 in response to processor 510 executing one or more sequencesof one or more instructions (which might be incorporated into theoperating system 540 and/or other code, such as an application program545) contained in the working memory 535. Such instructions may be readinto the working memory 535 from another computer readable medium, suchas one or more of the storage device(s) 525. Merely by way of example,execution of the sequences of instructions contained in the workingmemory 535 might cause the processor(s) 510 to perform one or moreprocedures of the methods described herein.

The terms “machine readable medium” and “computer readable medium,” asused herein, refer to any medium that participates in providing datathat causes a machine to operate in a specific fashion. In an embodimentimplemented using the computer or hardware system 500, various computerreadable media might be involved in providing instructions/code toprocessor(s) 510 for execution and/or might be used to store and/orcarry such instructions/code (e.g., as signals). In manyimplementations, a computer readable medium is a non-transitory,physical, and/or tangible storage medium. In some embodiments, acomputer readable medium may take many forms, including, but not limitedto, non-volatile media, volatile media, or the like. Non-volatile mediaincludes, for example, optical and/or magnetic disks, such as thestorage device(s) 525. Volatile media includes, without limitation,dynamic memory, such as the working memory 535. In some alternativeembodiments, a computer readable medium may take the form oftransmission media, which includes, without limitation, coaxial cables,copper wire, and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise the bus505, as well as the various components of the communication subsystem530 (and/or the media by which the communications subsystem 530 providescommunication with other devices). In an alternative set of embodiments,transmission media can also take the form of waves (including withoutlimitation radio, acoustic, and/or light waves, such as those generatedduring radio-wave and infra-red data communications).

Common forms of physical and/or tangible computer readable mediainclude, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, a hard disk,magnetic tape, or any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, any other opticalmedium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patternsof holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chipor cartridge, a carrier wave as described hereinafter, or any othermedium from which a computer can read instructions and/or code.

Various forms of computer readable media may be involved in carrying oneor more sequences of one or more instructions to the processor(s) 510for execution. Merely by way of example, the instructions may initiallybe carried on a magnetic disk and/or optical disc of a remote computer.A remote computer might load the instructions into its dynamic memoryand send the instructions as signals over a transmission medium to bereceived and/or executed by the computer or hardware system 500. Thesesignals, which might be in the form of electromagnetic signals, acousticsignals, optical signals, and/or the like, are all examples of carrierwaves on which instructions can be encoded, in accordance with variousembodiments of the invention.

The communications subsystem 530 (and/or components thereof) generallywill receive the signals, and the bus 505 then might carry the signals(and/or the data, instructions, etc. carried by the signals) to theworking memory 535, from which the processor(s) 505 retrieves andexecutes the instructions. The instructions received by the workingmemory 535 may optionally be stored on a storage device 525 eitherbefore or after execution by the processor(s) 510.

As noted above, a set of embodiments comprises methods and systems forimplementing call or data routing, and, more particularly, to methods,systems, and apparatuses for implementing management of routing of voiceor data across multiple voice or data networks with separate routingmasters. FIG. 6 illustrates a schematic diagram of a system 600 that canbe used in accordance with one set of embodiments. The system 600 caninclude one or more user computers, user devices, or customer devices605. A user computer, user device, or customer device 605 can be ageneral purpose personal computer (including, merely by way of example,desktop computers, tablet computers, laptop computers, handheldcomputers, and the like, running any appropriate operating system,several of which are available from vendors such as Apple, MicrosoftCorp., and the like), cloud computing devices, a server(s), and/or aworkstation computer(s) running any of a variety ofcommercially-available UNIX™ or UNIX-like operating systems. A usercomputer, user device, or customer device 605 can also have any of avariety of applications, including one or more applications configuredto perform methods provided by various embodiments (as described above,for example), as well as one or more office applications, databaseclient and/or server applications, and/or web browser applications.Alternatively, a user computer, user device, or customer device 605 canbe any other electronic device, such as a thin-client computer,Internet-enabled mobile telephone, and/or personal digital assistant,capable of communicating via a network (e.g., the network(s) 610described below) and/or of displaying and navigating web pages or othertypes of electronic documents. Although the exemplary system 600 isshown with four user computers, user devices, or customer devices 605,any number of user computers, user devices, or customer devices can besupported.

Certain embodiments operate in a networked environment, which caninclude a network(s) 610. The network(s) 610 can be any type of networkfamiliar to those skilled in the art that can support datacommunications using any of a variety of commercially-available (and/orfree or proprietary) protocols, including, without limitation, TCP/IP,SNA™, IPX™, AppleTalk™, and the like. Merely by way of example, thenetwork(s) 610 (similar to network(s) 120 a-120 n, 220 a-220 n, 320 a,and 320 b of FIGS. 1-3, or the like) can each include a local areanetwork (“LAN”), including, without limitation, a fiber network, anEthernet network, a Token-Ring™ network, and/or the like; a wide-areanetwork (“WAN”); a wireless wide area network (“WWAN”); a virtualnetwork, such as a virtual private network (“VPN”); the Internet; anintranet; an extranet; a public switched telephone network (“PSTN”); aninfra-red network; a wireless network, including, without limitation, anetwork operating under any of the IEEE 802.11 suite of protocols, theBluetooth™ protocol known in the art, and/or any other wirelessprotocol; and/or any combination of these and/or other networks. In aparticular embodiment, the network might include an access network ofthe service provider (e.g., an Internet service provider (“ISP”)). Inanother embodiment, the network might include a core network of theservice provider, and/or the Internet.

Embodiments can also include one or more server computers 615. Each ofthe server computers 615 may be configured with an operating system,including, without limitation, any of those discussed above, as well asany commercially (or freely) available server operating systems. Each ofthe servers 615 may also be running one or more applications, which canbe configured to provide services to one or more clients 605 and/orother servers 615.

Merely by way of example, one of the servers 615 might be a data server,a web server, a cloud computing device(s), or the like, as describedabove. The data server might include (or be in communication with) a webserver, which can be used, merely by way of example, to process requestsfor web pages or other electronic documents from user computers 605. Theweb server can also run a variety of server applications, including HTTPservers, FTP servers, CGI servers, database servers, Java servers, andthe like. In some embodiments of the invention, the web server may beconfigured to serve web pages that can be operated within a web browseron one or more of the user computers 605 to perform methods of theinvention.

The server computers 615, in some embodiments, might include one or moreapplication servers, which can be configured with one or moreapplications accessible by a client running on one or more of the clientcomputers 605 and/or other servers 615. Merely by way of example, theserver(s) 615 can be one or more general purpose computers capable ofexecuting programs or scripts in response to the user computers 605and/or other servers 615, including, without limitation, webapplications (which might, in some cases, be configured to performmethods provided by various embodiments). Merely by way of example, aweb application can be implemented as one or more scripts or programswritten in any suitable programming language, such as Java™, C, C#™ orC++, and/or any scripting language, such as Perl, Python, or TCL, aswell as combinations of any programming and/or scripting languages. Theapplication server(s) can also include database servers, including,without limitation, those commercially available from Oracle™,Microsoft™, Sybase™, IBM™, and the like, which can process requests fromclients (including, depending on the configuration, dedicated databaseclients, API clients, web browsers, etc.) running on a user computer,user device, or customer device 605 and/or another server 615. In someembodiments, an application server can perform one or more of theprocesses for implementing call or data routing, and, more particularly,to methods, systems, and apparatuses for implementing management ofrouting of voice or data across multiple voice or data networks withseparate routing masters, as described in detail above. Data provided byan application server may be formatted as one or more web pages(comprising HTML, JavaScript, etc., for example) and/or may be forwardedto a user computer 605 via a web server (as described above, forexample). Similarly, a web server might receive web page requests and/orinput data from a user computer 605 and/or forward the web page requestsand/or input data to an application server. In some cases, a web servermay be integrated with an application server.

In accordance with further embodiments, one or more servers 615 canfunction as a file server and/or can include one or more of the files(e.g., application code, data files, etc.) necessary to implementvarious disclosed methods, incorporated by an application running on auser computer 605 and/or another server 615. Alternatively, as thoseskilled in the art will appreciate, a file server can include allnecessary files, allowing such an application to be invoked remotely bya user computer, user device, or customer device 605 and/or server 615.

It should be noted that the functions described with respect to variousservers herein (e.g., application server, database server, web server,file server, etc.) can be performed by a single server and/or aplurality of specialized servers, depending on implementation-specificneeds and parameters.

In certain embodiments, the system can include one or more databases 620a-620 n (collectively, “databases 620”). The location of each of thedatabases 620 is discretionary: merely by way of example, a database 620a might reside on a storage medium local to (and/or resident in) aserver 615 a (and/or a user computer, user device, or customer device605). Alternatively, a database 620 n can be remote from any or all ofthe computers 605, 615, so long as it can be in communication (e.g., viathe network 610) with one or more of these. In a particular set ofembodiments, a database 620 can reside in a storage-area network (“SAN”)familiar to those skilled in the art. (Likewise, any necessary files forperforming the functions attributed to the computers 605, 615 can bestored locally on the respective computer and/or remotely, asappropriate.) In one set of embodiments, the database 620 can be arelational database, such as an Oracle database, that is adapted tostore, update, and retrieve data in response to SQL-formatted commands.The database might be controlled and/or maintained by a database server,as described above, for example.

According to some embodiments, system 600 might further comprise acomputing system 625 (similar to computing systems 105, 205, and 305 ofFIGS. 1-3, or the like), one or more second user devices 630 (similar tocalled device 115 or second user devices 215 and 315 of FIGS. 1-3, orthe like), second network(s) 635 (similar to second network(s) 120 b,220 b, and 320 b of FIGS. 1-3, or the like), first routing engine 640and corresponding first routing database(s) 645 (similar to firstrouting engines 125 a, 225 a, and 325 a and corresponding first routingdatabase(s) 130 a, 230 a, and 330 a of FIGS. 1-3, or the like), andsecond routing engine 650 and corresponding second routing database(s)655 (similar to second routing engines 125 b, 225 b, and 325 b andcorresponding second routing database(s) 130 b, 230 b, and 330 b ofFIGS. 1-3, or the like).

In some embodiments, the computing system might comprise at least one ofa call server, a call controller, a call manager, a media gatewaycontroller, centralized call server, a centralized call controller, acentralized call manager, or a centralized media gateway controller,and/or the like. According to some embodiments, the first set of networkinformation and the second set of network information might eachcomprise at least one of private peering agreements, private commercialexchange data, traffic exchange agreements, cost data for trafficexchange, service level agreements, minimum contractually requiredtraffic, maximum contractually required traffic, local exchange routingguide (“LERG”) data, number portability, key performance indicator(“KPI”) data, data regarding health of network routes, capacity ofnetwork routes, quality of service (“QoS”), industry data, service levelagreements (“SLA”), connectivity details, usage data, call detailrecords, call statistics, network connectivity statistics, networkconfiguration data, or other attributes from each network, and/or thelike.

In operation, the computing system 625 might receive, from a callingparty at an originating point (via a first user device(s), e.g., firstuser device(s) 605, or the like) in at least one first network (e.g.,first network(s) 610, or the like), a request to establish a callbetween the calling party and a called party at a destination point (viaa second user device(s), e.g., second user device(s) 630, or the like)in at least one second network (e.g., second network(s) 635, or thelike). The computing system 625 might receive a first set of networkinformation from one or more first routing databases associated with theat least one first network that is operated by a first service provider;might receive a second set of network information from one or moresecond routing databases associated with the at least one second networkthat is operated by a second service provider that is separate from thefirst service provider; and (optionally) might receive a third set ofnetwork information from one or more third routing databases associatedwith at least one third network (not shown in FIG. 6) operated by athird service provider that is separate from each of the first serviceprovider and the second service provider. The computing system 625 mightanalyze the received network information (e.g., the received first setof network information, the received second set of network information,and (optionally) the received third set of network information, or thelike) to generate a unified routing model for optimizing routing of thecall between the calling party and the called party through the at leastone first network and the at least one second network (and optionallythe at least one third network). The computing system 625 might selectan optimized route through the at least one first network and the atleast one second network for establishing the call based at least inpart on the generated unified routing model; and might establish thecall based at least in part on the selected optimized route.

These and other functions of the system 600 (and its components) aredescribed in greater detail above with respect to FIGS. 1-4.

While certain features and aspects have been described with respect toexemplary embodiments, one skilled in the art will recognize thatnumerous modifications are possible. For example, the methods andprocesses described herein may be implemented using hardware components,software components, and/or any combination thereof. Further, whilevarious methods and processes described herein may be described withrespect to particular structural and/or functional components for easeof description, methods provided by various embodiments are not limitedto any particular structural and/or functional architecture but insteadcan be implemented on any suitable hardware, firmware and/or softwareconfiguration. Similarly, while certain functionality is ascribed tocertain system components, unless the context dictates otherwise, thisfunctionality can be distributed among various other system componentsin accordance with the several embodiments.

Moreover, while the procedures of the methods and processes describedherein are described in a particular order for ease of description,unless the context dictates otherwise, various procedures may bereordered, added, and/or omitted in accordance with various embodiments.Moreover, the procedures described with respect to one method or processmay be incorporated within other described methods or processes;likewise, system components described according to a particularstructural architecture and/or with respect to one system may beorganized in alternative structural architectures and/or incorporatedwithin other described systems. Hence, while various embodiments aredescribed with—or without—certain features for ease of description andto illustrate exemplary aspects of those embodiments, the variouscomponents and/or features described herein with respect to a particularembodiment can be substituted, added and/or subtracted from among otherdescribed embodiments, unless the context dictates otherwise.Consequently, although several exemplary embodiments are describedabove, it will be appreciated that the invention is intended to coverall modifications and equivalents within the scope of the followingclaims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method, comprising: receiving, with a computingsystem from a calling party at an originating point in at least onefirst network, a request to establish a call between the calling partyand a called party at a destination point in at least one secondnetwork; receiving, with the computing system, a first set of networkinformation from one or more first routing databases associated with theat least one first network that is operated by a first service provider;receiving, with the computing system, a second set of networkinformation from one or more second routing databases associated withthe at least one second network that is operated by a second serviceprovider that is separate from the first service provider; analyzing,with the computing system, the received first set of network informationand the received second set of network information to generate a unifiedrouting model for optimizing routing of the call between the callingparty and the called party through the at least one first network andthe at least one second network; selecting, with the computing system,an optimized route through the at least one first network and the atleast one second network for establishing the call based at least inpart on the generated unified routing model; and establishing, with thecomputing system, the call based at least in part on the selectedoptimized route.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the computing systemcomprises at least one of a call server, a call controller, a callmanager, a media gateway controller, centralized call server, acentralized call controller, a centralized call manager, or acentralized media gateway controller.
 3. The method of claim 1, whereinthe calling device associated with the calling party comprises at leastone of a telephone, a voice over Internet protocol (“VoIP”) privatebranch exchange (“PBX”), a time-division multiplexing (“TDM”) voice PBX,a VoIP soft client, a facsimile machine, or a voice origination device.4. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one first network and theat least one second network each comprises at least one of acircuit-switched network, a public switched telephone network, a voiceover Internet protocol (“VoIP”) network, a computer network, or theInternet.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first set of networkinformation and the second set of network information each comprises atleast one of private peering agreements, private commercial exchangedata, traffic exchange agreements, cost data for traffic exchange,service level agreements, minimum contractually required traffic,maximum contractually required traffic, local exchange routing guide(“LERG”) data, number portability, key performance indicator (“KPI”)data, data regarding health of network routes, capacity of networkroutes, quality of service (“QoS”), industry data, service levelagreements (“SLA”), connectivity details, usage data, call detailrecords, call statistics, network connectivity statistics, networkconfiguration data, or other attributes from each network.
 6. The methodof claim 1, further comprising: applying, with the computing system,weighting factors to predetermined categories of data among each of thefirst set of network information and the second set of networkinformation; wherein generating the unified routing model for optimizingrouting of the call between the calling party and the called partythrough the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork comprises generating the unified routing model for optimizingrouting of the call between the calling party and the called partythrough the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork based at least in part on the applied weighting factors to thepredetermined categories of data among each of the first set of networkinformation and the second set of network information.
 7. The method ofclaim 6, wherein the weighting factors are based on at least one of keyperformance indicator (“KPI”) data, data regarding health of networkroutes, capacity of network routes, quality of service (“QoS”), industrydata, service level agreements (“SLA”), or private commercial exchangedata.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting the optimized routethrough the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork for establishing the call based on the generated unified routingmodel comprises: identifying, with the computing system, one or moredirect routes through each of the at least one first network and the atleast one second network between the originating point and thedestination point; identifying, with the computing system, one or moreindirect routes through each of the at least one first network and theat least one second network between the originating point and thedestination point; identifying, with the computing system, one or morecustomers connected to each of the at least one first network and the atleast one second network; analyzing, with the computing system, at leastone of the identified one or more direct routes, the identified one ormore indirect routes, or the identified one or more customers; andselecting, with the computing system, an optimized route through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network forestablishing the call based at least in part on the generated unifiedrouting model and based at least in part on the analysis of the at leastone of the identified one or more direct routes, the identified one ormore indirect routes, or the identified one or more customers.
 9. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising: normalizing, with the computingsystem, routing data to fit each subnetwork within each of the at leastone first network and the at least one second network; and datafilling,with the computing system, each routing engine in each correspondingsubnetwork within each of the at least one first network and the atleast one second network with the normalized routing data; whereinestablishing the call based on the selected optimized route comprisessending, with the computing system, routing instructions to each routingengine in each corresponding subnetwork within each of the at least onefirst network and the at least one second network to route the callbased on the normalized routing data.
 10. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising: receiving, with the computing system, a third set of networkinformation from one or more third routing databases associated with atleast one third network operated by a third service provider that isseparate from each of the first service provider and the second serviceprovider; wherein analyzing the received first set of networkinformation and the received second set of network information togenerate the unified routing model for optimizing routing of the callbetween the calling party and the called party comprises analyzing, withthe computing system, the received first set of network information, thereceived second set of network information, and the received third setof network information to generate a unified routing model foroptimizing routing of the call between the calling party and the calledparty through the at least one first network, the at least one secondnetwork, and the at least one third network; wherein selecting theoptimized route through the at least one first network and the at leastone second network for establishing the call based at least in part onthe generated unified routing model comprises selecting, with thecomputing system, an optimized route through the at least one firstnetwork, the at least one second network, and the at least one thirdnetwork for establishing the call based at least in part on thegenerated unified routing model; and wherein establishing the call basedat least in part on the selected optimized route comprises establishing,with the computing system, the call through the at least one firstnetwork, the at least one second network, and the at least one thirdnetwork based at least in part on the selected optimized route.
 11. Anapparatus, comprising: at least one processor; and a non-transitorycomputer readable medium communicatively coupled to the at least oneprocessor, the non-transitory computer readable medium having storedthereon computer software comprising a set of instructions that, whenexecuted by the at least one processor, causes the apparatus to:receive, from a calling party at an originating point in at least onefirst network, a request to establish a call between the calling partyand a called party at a destination point in at least one secondnetwork; receive a first set of network information from one or morefirst routing databases associated with the at least one first networkthat is operated by a first service provider; receive a second set ofnetwork information from one or more second routing databases associatedwith the at least one second network that is operated by a secondservice provider that is separate from the first service provider;analyze the received first set of network information and the receivedsecond set of network information to generate a unified routing modelfor optimizing routing of the call between the calling party and thecalled party through the at least one first network and the at least onesecond network; select an optimized route through the at least one firstnetwork and the at least one second network for establishing the callbased at least in part on the generated unified routing model; andestablish the call based at least in part on the selected optimizedroute.
 12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the apparatus comprises atleast one of a call server, a call controller, a call manager, a mediagateway controller, centralized call server, a centralized callcontroller, a centralized call manager, or a centralized media gatewaycontroller.
 13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the at least onefirst network and the at least one second network each comprises atleast one of a circuit-switched network, a public switched telephonenetwork, a voice over Internet protocol (“VoIP”) network, a computernetwork, or the Internet.
 14. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein thefirst set of network information and the second set of networkinformation each comprises at least one of private peering agreements,private commercial exchange data, traffic exchange agreements, cost datafor traffic exchange, service level agreements, minimum contractuallyrequired traffic, maximum contractually required traffic, local exchangerouting guide (“LERG”) data, number portability, key performanceindicator (“KPI”) data, data regarding health of network routes,capacity of network routes, quality of service (“QoS”), industry data,service level agreements (“SLA”), connectivity details, usage data, calldetail records, call statistics, network connectivity statistics,network configuration data, or other attributes from each network. 15.The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the set of instructions, whenexecuted by the at least one processor, further causes the apparatus to:apply weighting factors to predetermined categories of data among eachof the first set of network information and the second set of networkinformation; wherein generating the unified routing model for optimizingrouting of the call between the calling party and the called partythrough the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork comprises generating the unified routing model for optimizingrouting of the call between the calling party and the called partythrough the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork based at least in part on the applied weighting factors to thepredetermined categories of data among each of the first set of networkinformation and the second set of network information.
 16. The apparatusof claim 15, wherein the weighting factors are based on at least one ofkey performance indicator (“KPI”) data, data regarding health of networkroutes, capacity of network routes, quality of service (“QoS”), industrydata, service level agreements (“SLA”), or private commercial exchangedata.
 17. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein selecting the optimizedroute through the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork for establishing the call based on the generated unified routingmodel comprises: identifying one or more direct routes through each ofthe at least one first network and the at least one second networkbetween the originating point and the destination point; identifying oneor more indirect routes through each of the at least one first networkand the at least one second network between the originating point andthe destination point; identifying one or more customers connected toeach of the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork; analyzing at least one of the identified one or more directroutes, the identified one or more indirect routes, or the identifiedone or more customers; and selecting an optimized route through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network forestablishing the call based at least in part on the generated unifiedrouting model and based at least in part on the analysis of the at leastone of the identified one or more direct routes, the identified one ormore indirect routes, or the identified one or more customers.
 18. Theapparatus of claim 11, wherein the set of instructions, when executed bythe at least one processor, further causes the apparatus to: normalizerouting data to fit each subnetwork within each of the at least onefirst network and the at least one second network; and datafill eachrouting engine in each corresponding subnetwork within each of the atleast one first network and the at least one second network with thenormalized routing data; wherein establishing the call based on theselected optimized route comprises sending routing instructions to eachrouting engine in each corresponding subnetwork within each of the atleast one first network and the at least one second network to route thecall based on the normalized routing data.
 19. The apparatus of claim11, wherein the set of instructions, when executed by the at least oneprocessor, further causes the apparatus to: receive a third set ofnetwork information from one or more third routing databases associatedwith at least one third network operated by a third service providerthat is separate from each of the first service provider and the secondservice provider; wherein analyzing the received first set of networkinformation and the received second set of network information togenerate the unified routing model for optimizing routing of the callbetween the calling party and the called party comprises analyzing thereceived first set of network information, the received second set ofnetwork information, and the received third set of network informationto generate a unified routing model for optimizing routing of the callbetween the calling party and the called party through the at least onefirst network, the at least one second network, and the at least onethird network; wherein selecting the optimized route through the atleast one first network and the at least one second network forestablishing the call based at least in part on the generated unifiedrouting model comprises selecting an optimized route through the atleast one first network, the at least one second network, and the atleast one third network for establishing the call based at least in parton the generated unified routing model; and wherein establishing thecall based at least in part on the selected optimized route comprisesestablishing the call through the at least one first network, the atleast one second network, and the at least one third network based atleast in part on the selected optimized route.
 20. A system, comprising:a computing system, comprising: at least one first processor; and afirst non-transitory computer readable medium communicatively coupled tothe at least one first processor, the first non-transitory computerreadable medium having stored thereon computer software comprising afirst set of instructions that, when executed by the at least one firstprocessor, causes the computing system to: receive, from a calling partyat an originating point in at least one first network, a request toestablish a call between the calling party and a called party at adestination point in at least one second network; receive a first set ofnetwork information from one or more first routing databases associatedwith the at least one first network that is operated by a first serviceprovider; receive a second set of network information from one or moresecond routing databases associated with the at least one second networkthat is operated by a second service provider that is separate from thefirst service provider; analyze the received first set of networkinformation and the received second set of network information togenerate a unified routing model for optimizing routing of the callbetween the calling party and the called party through the at least onefirst network and the at least one second network; select an optimizedroute through the at least one first network and the at least one secondnetwork for establishing the call based at least in part on thegenerated unified routing model; and establish the call based at leastin part on the selected optimized route.